366
Pituarie
r2 of Colonies
Corder to to -meuts
but the end of it is that the Archbishop of Canterbury applies to the
Sof State
3
to essice a mandate for the
consecration of the person belied and the mandate is prepared in the General Dept.
M
She Apilinin
M. Smith cannot find of Contesting
Letter of 5 Apr 1888/718
refarcit
For Natten
I that your Department had
any official conespondence with the CMS that the Missionary Society respecting the hi
The Revd M. Burdon at the requir apponitment of tobe Bishop but very likely it ma have been done privately.
the CMS th hallon of, 4/4
Co. as to the Selection of -Lop Bud
Mr. Smith has looked ich stay kayn
"The bat
communica with the Lecith In
the casespondence which took place in in respecting the reoreation of the Lin In 1872 and the conseciation M. Burdon, lent it runs into several Volumes 20 I do not send it on: but
Keeping is hew mease you
Jou 23/4/96
casse
want to see it.
I think this thus that the C.M.S. are ignorand of the Recreation of the Letter Pabal constituting the see of Victoria in 1843; & I don't whether (with the
on the
79477
J a Dinof in Strugtong
Exception of the case of Bishop Coplestin.
selection for the see of Colombo indond Carnaron's time) the Lecretary of
Jacting
Ställ has over interfered in the
"
nomination of any Colonial Bishops, hat has simply waited for the Archlichop of Canterbury to mention the name of a clergyman for insertion in the Mandate issued to the Archbishop, which in the Caller authority to consecrate_ Practically) believe it. Archlichopx consults those who find the moluments for the Bishop, in this case the Colmich Bishoprices Fund f I do nothman in what sort of relation
te tranties of that fund Hand tot. CMS.
I should be inclined to repl to the effect- that he was incorrect- in supposing that since the Revocation of half of t
Lellir, Patul
constituting Victoria the appriclimentat
resination of B alfons
to officiati
Lea
of
te obl
of
vestid
Мостови
in the Crown atthe nomination efte. I. 75. Athat-it-would not appear from the Read ofthin Departmel that there were any dinct comunicating betwen te do! & the C. M.§. presion to the selectiviche
Bishops Burden for confecration - But
366
Pituarie
r2 of Colonies
Corder to to -meuts
but the end of it is that the Archbinder
어
Canterbury applies to the
Sof State
3
to essice a mandate for the
consecration of the person belied and the mandate is prepared in the General Dept.
M
She Apilinin
M. Smith cannot find of Contesting
Letter of 5 k 8388/718
refarcit
For Natten
I that your Department had
any official conespondence with the chops that the Missionary Socrity respecting the hi
The Res M. Burdon at the requir apponitment of tobe Bishop but very likely it ma have been done privately.
the CMS th hallon of, 4/4
Co. as to the Selection of -Lop Bud
Mr. Smith has looked ich stay kayn
"The bat
communica with the Lecith In
the casespondence which took place in in respecting the reoreation of the Lin In 1872 and the conseciation M. Burdon, lent it runs into several Volumes 20 I do not send it on: but
Keeping is hew mease you
Jou 23/4/96
casse
want to see it.
I think this thus that the C.M.S. are ignorand of the Recreation of the Letter Pabal constituting the see of Victoria in 10%; & I don't whether (with the
on the
79477
J a Dinof in Strugtong
Exception of the case of Bishop Coplestin.
selection for the see of Colombo indond Carnaron's time) the Lecretary of
Jacting
Ställ has over interfered in the
"
nomination of any Colonial Bishops, hat has simply waited for the Archlich of to mention the name of a clergyman for insertion in the Mandate issued to the Archbishop, which in the Caller authority to consecrate_ Practically) believe it. Archlichopx consults those who find the moluments for the Bishop, in this case the Colmich Bishoprices Fund f I do nothman in what sort of relation
te tranties of that fund Hand tot. CMS.
I should be inclined to repl to the effect- that he was incorrect- in supposing that since the Revocation of half of t
Lellir, Patul
constituting Victoria the appriclimentat
resination of B alfons
to officiati
Lea
of
te obl
of
vestid
Мостови
in the Crown atthe nomination efte. I. 75. Athat-it-would not appear from the Read ofthin Departmel that there were any dinct comunicating betwen te do! & the C. M.§. presion to the selectiviche
Bishops Burden for confecration - But
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.